Dwarf Fortress Bug Tracker - Dwarf Fortress
View Issue Details
0006133Dwarf FortressDwarf Mode -- Trapspublic2012-07-25 09:092012-07-27 06:19
Niriel 
Knight Otu 
normalmajorsometimes
resolvedduplicate 
0.34.11 
 
0006133: Can't build Large Serrated Disc weapon traps with discs in bins.
I have about twenty large serrated discs, all claimed, in some bins on a weapon stockpile not far from where I want to build a weapon trap.

The list of components shows many weapons, but not my discs.

Since I had built such a trap before, I know it can work so I tried to move my discs around.

I an now able to build the trap with the discs I just bought, which are still on the trade depot, and discs that are not in bins (some being still carried by dwarves to a bin-less stockpile, already half-full, hard to tell which one I can use since it's all iron).
No tags attached.
duplicate of 0005992resolved Toady One Conflict between hauling jobs (i.e. filling containers) and other jobs using items in those containers 
Issue History
2012-07-25 09:09NirielNew Issue
2012-07-25 10:29TelarinNote Added: 0023356
2012-07-27 01:33NirielNote Added: 0023367
2012-07-27 01:33NirielNote Edited: 0023367bug_revision_view_page.php?bugnote_id=0023367#r8710
2012-07-27 06:19Knight OtuNote Added: 0023369
2012-07-27 06:19Knight OtuRelationship addedduplicate of 0005992
2012-07-27 06:19Knight OtuStatusnew => resolved
2012-07-27 06:19Knight OtuResolutionopen => duplicate
2012-07-27 06:19Knight OtuAssigned To => Knight Otu

Notes
(0023356)
Telarin   
2012-07-25 10:29   
This usually happens because the bin holding the discs has been tasked to be moved to a stockpile, or to gather up more discs.
(0023367)
Niriel   
2012-07-27 01:33   
Oh, that makes a lot of sense. Dunno if it's intentional or not though. On one hand, I do own and have access to these items so I expect I can use them, but on the other hand they're not currently stored where my mechanics expect them and they can't guess where they are.

(0023369)
Knight Otu   
2012-07-27 06:19   
I'll mark this as a duplicate of 0005992 then. That issue could use a rename, I think.