Dwarf Fortress Bug Tracker - Dwarf Fortress
View Issue Details
0009039Dwarf FortressDwarf Mode -- Jobs, Building Construction and Destructionpublic2015-08-05 02:262015-08-06 11:11
Windows 8.164bit
0009039: Invisible creature occupying construction spot
Dworfs refuse to construct a wall on a particular spot, giving a cancelation message of "creature blocking site". Game shows no creatures in that spot. Its not a matter of access, as destroying close walls (which built no problem, only one square is bugged) or even building a platform (so a builder can access the construction from other side) dont work. Its not a matter of materials or ETC.
Seems very similiar to bug nr 0003499 and 0006516.
1. Im using lazy newb pack with pure bugfixes on.
2. I used dfhack command of drain-aquifers (at the start of embark).
3. I disabled invasions for a starting period (Cmon, Im just preparing for a mega project)
4. I might have disabled and then reenabled cave-ins for a short time. (Due to being to lazy to manage channeling properly)

Adding savefile in a moment: VVV
0.40.24, construction
duplicate of 0003499acknowledged Footkerchief Can't build construction on tile, claims to be blocked by invisible creature 
Issue History
2015-08-05 02:26shivalNew Issue
2015-08-05 02:32shivalNote Added: 0032954
2015-08-05 02:34shivalTag Attached: 0.40.24
2015-08-05 02:34shivalTag Attached: construction
2015-08-05 04:41QuietustNote Added: 0032955
2015-08-05 04:43QuietustNote Edited: 0032955bug_revision_view_page.php?bugnote_id=0032955#r13250
2015-08-06 11:10lethosorNote Added: 0032957
2015-08-06 11:10lethosorRelationship addedduplicate of 0003499
2015-08-06 11:10lethosorStatusnew => resolved
2015-08-06 11:10lethosorResolutionopen => duplicate
2015-08-06 11:10lethosorAssigned To => lethosor
2015-08-06 11:11lethosorDescription Updatedbug_revision_view_page.php?rev_id=13255#r13255

2015-08-05 02:32   
Savegame: http://dffd.bay12games.com/file.php?id=11037 [^]
Its the one wall piece to the left.
2015-08-05 04:41   
(edited on: 2015-08-05 04:43)
Probably should've just added this as a comment to 0003499, since it sounds like the exact same problem...

2015-08-06 11:10   
Looks like 0003499 to me too. Thanks!