Dwarf Fortress Bug Tracker - Dwarf Fortress
View Issue Details
0002643Dwarf FortressSitespublic2010-07-11 17:452010-07-11 18:28
Mason11987 
Logical2u 
normalminorhave not tried
resolvedno change required 
0.31.10 
 
0002643: Sites that have coordinates (16,16) should have coordinates (16,0)
These are my worldgen xml files "sites"


<sites>
    <site>
        <id>1</id>
        <type>cave</type>
        <name>the sewer of cudgels</name>
        <coords>6,0</coords>
    </site>
    <site>
        <id>2</id>
        <type>cave</type>
        <name>oceanhells the sourness of silence</name>
        <coords>16,16</coords>
    </site>
    <site>
        <id>3</id>
        <type>dwarf fortress</type>
        <name>helmedwash</name>
        <coords>14,5</coords>
    </site>
    <site>
        <id>4</id>
        <type>city</type>
        <name>sparkledamazes</name>
        <coords>15,13</coords>
        <structures>
        </structures>
    </site>
    <site>
        <id>5</id>
        <type>city</type>
        <name>appeargales</name>
        <coords>4,2</coords>
        <structures>
        </structures>
    </site>
    <site>
        <id>6</id>
        <type>city</type>
        <name>pastwaved</name>
        <coords>7,9</coords>
        <structures>
        </structures>
    </site>
    <site>
        <id>7</id>
        <type>tree city</type>
        <name>cactusgleams</name>
        <coords>8,16</coords>
    </site>
</sites>

As you can see id 2 has coord: 16,16, but if you look on the map, it is shown in location (16,0)

http://imgur.com/2ZQLT.png [^]

all of the other sites aren't working. I'm not sure if the last column shifts it around 1, or if it being in the top right right corner causes it to post the site wrong, but there is something amiss here. It's probably not extremely easy to reproduce though.
Gen a world, look for a site that is on the map 16,0 and the xml will have the site location at 16,16 (perhaps?)
I used a mod to gen this world, so it's possible that they broke something and this wouldn't happen in a vanilla, but it might be worth investigating regardless.
No tags attached.
Issue History
2010-07-11 17:45Mason11987New Issue
2010-07-11 17:51QuietustNote Added: 0009990
2010-07-11 17:54QuietustNote Edited: 0009990bug_revision_view_page.php?bugnote_id=0009990#r3856
2010-07-11 17:54QuietustNote Edited: 0009990bug_revision_view_page.php?bugnote_id=0009990#r3857
2010-07-11 17:54Mason11987Note Added: 0009991
2010-07-11 17:55QuietustNote Edited: 0009990bug_revision_view_page.php?bugnote_id=0009990#r3858
2010-07-11 17:56QuietustNote Added: 0009992
2010-07-11 17:57QuietustNote Edited: 0009992bug_revision_view_page.php?bugnote_id=0009992#r3860
2010-07-11 18:00Mason11987Note Added: 0009993
2010-07-11 18:28Logical2uNote Added: 0009995
2010-07-11 18:28Logical2uStatusnew => resolved
2010-07-11 18:28Logical2uResolutionopen => no change required
2010-07-11 18:28Logical2uAssigned To => Logical2u

Notes
(0009990)
Quietust   
2010-07-11 17:51   
(edited on: 2010-07-11 17:55)
Are you sure you're reading it correctly? Coordinate 16,0 cannot possibly have a cave, as it's surrounded entirely by mountains and is thus inaccessible via [T]ravel; similarly, coordinate 0,16 is in the middle of the ocean.

Coordinate 16,16 would put the cave at the bottom-right corner of the map, though it's hidden (due to worldgen parms) and thus isn't visible on the screenshot (if you go in Adventurer mode, you should find it there).

(0009991)
Mason11987   
2010-07-11 17:54   
I assumed 16,0 was a cave because it had the same mark as a the cave (id:1) on (6,0). BUT could that actually be a volcano, that just HAPPENS to have a cave (not visible) on the same tile?
(0009992)
Quietust   
2010-07-11 17:56   
(edited on: 2010-07-11 17:57)
6,0 is indeed a volcano, but there's also a cave hidden there as well (would show up as a dark-gray • when you approach it in Adventurer mode). 16,0 is just a mountain peak.

(0009993)
Mason11987   
2010-07-11 18:00   
Ah, okay. I didn't realize caves weren't shown on the map, and those two matching tripped me up.

Okay, this isn't a bug then. It can be closed.

Sorry! :)
(0009995)
Logical2u   
2010-07-11 18:28   
Glad that someone could help you!